New Ledger Breach: Your Crypto is Safe, But Your Personal Security is at Risk
On January 5th, many Ledger hardware wallet customers received a concerning email: their names and contact information had been compromised in a data breach affecting Global-e, a third-party payment processor. While the initial reports clarified that crucial data like payment card details, passwords, and, most importantly, 24-word recovery phrases remained secure, the incident highlights a growing and often overlooked threat in the crypto space. This isn’t about losing your crypto directly; it’s about the escalating risk to your physical safety and the long-term viability of self-custody in an increasingly targeted environment.
The Breach: What Happened and What Wasn't Compromised
BleepingComputer reported that attackers gained access to shopper order data from Global-e’s cloud system, successfully copying names, postal addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, and order details. Critically, the secure element within Ledger wallets – the component protecting your private keys – was not affected. The hardware itself remained untouched, and the firmware remained secure. This is, in many ways, the “best-case scenario” for a data breach. However, in the world of cryptocurrency, a leaked shipping label can be the first step in a sophisticated phishing funnel, or, in the most alarming cases, a direct threat to your physical well-being.
The Real Vulnerability: The Commerce Stack
This incident is a prime example of a “commerce-stack breach.” No cryptographic keys were touched, no devices were backdoored, and no exploit defeated Ledger’s secure element. What attackers obtained was far more practical: a high-quality contact list of confirmed hardware wallet owners, complete with home shipping addresses. For phishing operators, this is invaluable infrastructure-grade targeting data. The hardware wallet performed its intended function, but the surrounding commercial apparatus inadvertently provided attackers with everything they needed to launch targeted attacks.
Ledger's History of Data Breaches: A Pattern Emerges
Ledger isn’t unfamiliar with data breaches. In June 2020, an attacker exploited a misconfigured API key to access the company’s e-commerce database, exposing the email addresses of one million users. 272,000 records included full names, postal addresses, and phone numbers. Bitdefender characterized this as a “golden opportunity for scammers.”
The attacks that followed were swift and aggressive. Fake breach notices urged users to “verify” their recovery phrases on cloned websites, and fraudulent Ledger Live updates delivered credential harvesters. Some even involved extortion emails threatening home invasions, made credible by the attackers’ possession of victims’ addresses and confirmed wallet purchases. This demonstrates a clear escalation in the tactics employed by malicious actors.
The Persistence of Leaked Data: A Long-Term Threat
Personally identifiable information (PII) leaks in the crypto space have an unusual durability. The 2020 Ledger list didn’t simply disappear. In 2021, criminals mailed physically tampered “replacement” devices to addresses from the dump. These shrink-wrapped packages, bearing fake letterhead, instructed victims to enter their recovery phrases on modified hardware designed to exfiltrate seeds. By December 2024, BleepingComputer documented a new phishing campaign using subject lines like “Security Alert: Data Breach May Expose Your Recovery Phrase.”
MetaMask’s 2025 threat report further highlighted this issue, noting that physical letters were sent via postal mail to 2020 victims on fake Ledger stationery, directing them to fraudulent support lines. This dataset has become a permanent fixture, recycled across email, SMS, and traditional mail, demonstrating the long-lasting consequences of a single data breach.
The Global-e breach provides attackers with a new version of this same weapon. Ledger’s warning explicitly anticipates this: expect phishing leveraging the leak, verify all domains, ignore urgency cues, and never share your 24-word phrase.
When Phishing Escalates to Physical Threats: The Rise of "Wrench Attacks"
The 2020 leak didn’t directly compromise a Ledger device, but it normalized treating customer lists as inputs to serious crime. Bitdefender noted ransom emails using leaked addresses to threaten home invasions. Ledger took down 171 phishing sites in the first two months following the 2020 breach. However, the threat has evolved beyond phishing.
Reports document escalating physical robberies, home invasions, and even kidnappings aimed at extracting private keys across France, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. These attacks, often referred to as “wrench attacks,” are becoming increasingly common. One particularly alarming incident involved the January 2025 kidnapping of Ledger co-founder David Balland and his partner, during which attackers severed a finger while demanding ransom.
Previous Ledger leaks have been linked to a surge in violent attacks on crypto executives, correlating with breaches at Ledger, Kroll, and Coinbase that exposed the details of high-net-worth users. Criminals stitch together leaked databases with public records to profile and locate targets. TRM Labs confirms this mechanism: personal information gathered online, such as addresses and family details, simplifies profiling victims for home invasions, even when the wallet technology itself remains uncompromised.
Law enforcement now treats crypto-specific PII leaks as ingredients in violent extortion schemes.
Addressing an Ecosystem Problem: Beyond Ledger
Ledger isn’t alone in facing this challenge. When Kroll was breached in August 2023, the data of FTX, BlockFi, and Genesis creditors was accessed. Lawsuits allege the mishandling of this data led to a deluge of phishing emails spoofing claims portals. The pattern is consistent: third-party vendors hold “non-sensitive” data that becomes critically sensitive when tied to crypto asset ownership. A shipping address is merely metadata until it’s linked to a hardware wallet order.
The commerce layer – encompassing merchant platforms, CRMs, and shipping integrations – creates a map of who owns what and where to find them. This interconnectedness creates vulnerabilities that extend beyond the security of the wallet itself.
Protecting Yourself: Beyond Ledger’s Advice
Ledger’s advice – verify domains, ignore urgency, and never share your seed phrase – is sound. However, security researchers suggest expanding these measures. Users with high-value holdings should consider enabling the optional passphrase feature, a 25th word that exists only in memory. Additionally, users should rotate their contact information periodically, use unique email addresses for wallet purchases, and monitor for SIM-swap attempts.
Address exposure carries offline risk. Delivery minimization strategies, such as mail forwarding, using a business address, or utilizing pickup locations, can reduce the surface area for physical coercion. While wrench attacks remain statistically rare, they represent a real and growing threat.
Unanswered Questions and the Future of Crypto Security
The Global-e incident raises several unanswered questions: How many customers were affected? What specific fields were accessed? Were other Global-e clients compromised? What logs track the intruder’s movement? These questions demand transparency and accountability.
The crypto industry needs to fundamentally rethink the risks associated with its commerce infrastructure. If self-custody aims to remove trusted third parties from asset control, handing customer data to e-commerce platforms and payment processors creates exploitable maps of targets. The hardware wallet might be a fortress, but business operations create persistent vulnerabilities.
The Global-e breach won’t hack a single Ledger device. It doesn’t need to. It has given attackers a fresh list of names, addresses, and proof-of-purchase – everything required to launch phishing campaigns that will run for years and, in rare cases, enable crimes that don’t require bypassing encryption. The real vulnerability isn’t the secure element; it’s the paper trail leading to users’ doors.
Mentioned in this article: Ledger, TRM Labs, Coinbase, FTX, BlockFi, Genesis, MetaMask
Disclaimer: Our writers' opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies. For more information, see our company disclaimers.