Europe’s Crypto Renaissance: Is a “Venue Gap” Killing Your Execution?
The euro finally has a substantial stablecoin market, and for once, it’s not confined to the niche corners of DeFi. When MiCA’s stablecoin rules kicked in June 2024, they transformed euro-pegged stablecoins into a regulated product category, complete with paperwork, reserve rules, and a clear licensing pathway. This has sparked significant growth, but a crucial question remains: is this growth translating into genuinely improved trading conditions for all participants? This article dives deep into the post-MiCA landscape, analyzing the surge in euro stablecoin adoption, the underlying forces driving it, and whether the benefits are being evenly distributed across the European crypto market.
MiCA’s Impact: A 102% Market Cap Increase
Under MiCA, stablecoins referencing a single fiat currency fall into the “e-money token” bucket, while those tied to a basket are classified as “asset-referenced tokens.” This distinction necessitates compliance for issuers and exchanges wanting to offer euro stablecoins to EU users, impacting listings, disclosures, and routing. DECTA’s “Euro Stablecoin Trends Report 2025” reveals a striking post-MiCA arithmetic: a 102% increase in the market capitalization of major euro-pegged stablecoins in the 12 months following MiCA’s rollout, reversing a 48% decline in the preceding year.
The combined market cap reached $500 million in May 2025, with aggregated monthly transaction volume jumping from $383 million to $3.832 billion. EURC and EURCV logged the biggest transaction volume increases within the dataset. This paints a positive picture of stablecoin rails in the EU, but a deeper investigation reveals a more nuanced reality.
The Euro Stablecoin Boom: A Forced Adoption?
While the growth is undeniable, understanding the *why* behind it is crucial. The initial surge in euro stablecoin market share wasn’t solely driven by organic demand. A significant portion was a result of exchanges aligning with the new regulatory framework.
Kaiko’s October 2024 report highlighted this “reset.” Roughly three months after MiCA’s launch, MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins (including EURC and Société Générale’s EURCV) achieved a record 67% market share. However, weekly trading volumes for EUR-backed stablecoins remained around $30 million, significantly below the ~$100 million seen in March 2024. This indicates the pie didn’t grow substantially; the slices were simply rearranged due to regulatory pressure.
By November 2024, this rearrangement was largely complete. Kaiko’s “State of the European Crypto Market” report showed MiCA-compliant EUR stablecoins (EURC, EURCV, and Banking Circle’s EURI) reaching a record 91% market share. This demonstrates a key lesson: stablecoin supply and market share can shift rapidly when regulations dictate venue behavior. However, this doesn’t automatically translate to improved trading execution.
Liquidity: Beyond Supply and Market Share
A plentiful stablecoin supply doesn’t guarantee better execution if it’s concentrated on the wrong venues, resides in thin liquidity pools, or is primarily used for settlement between a few deep order books. What does better liquidity actually look like?
- Tighter Spreads: The difference between the best buy and sell prices should be minimized.
- Deeper Books: Larger trade sizes should be possible without significantly impacting the price.
Kaiko uses the “1% market depth” metric – the amount of size available within 1% of the mid-price on both sides of the order book – as a useful proxy for market depth. Stablecoin rails are most effective when they facilitate funding and rebalancing for market makers and large traders, especially when fiat transfers are slow or restricted.
Concentration is Key: The Venue Gap
The improvement in Europe’s BTC-EUR and ETH-EUR trading wasn’t a broad-based renaissance. Kaiko’s data reveals a significant concentration of trading activity. Bitvavo, Kraken, Coinbase, and Binance accounted for over 85% of total euro-denominated trading volume in November 2024. Within that, Bitvavo held around 50% share, with Kraken in second place.
This concentration challenges the notion of widespread liquidity improvement. Liquidity is being pulled into a select few venues, leading to tighter spreads and deeper books *on those platforms*, while the long tail remains expensive and patchy. For retail traders on these platforms, it may *feel* like liquidity has improved. For sophisticated traders, routing choice becomes paramount.
Spread and Depth Data: A Tale of Two Venues
Kaiko’s spread data illustrates this point clearly. The 30-day average bid-ask spreads for top tokens ranged from over 20 bps on One Trading to just 2.6 bps on Bitvavo and 3 bps on Kraken. Depth data confirms this trend: BTC-EUR ranked as the second-deepest BTC-fiat market in Kaiko’s sample, averaging daily depth of 758 BTC, more than double BTC-GBP at 350 BTC.
For traders operating in European time zones, these metrics are critical for calm and efficient execution.
Euro Stablecoins: A Necessary Rail, Not a Standalone Solution
Did euro stablecoins *cause* this improvement? The evidence suggests they were a necessary, but not sufficient, condition. Much of the early growth was compliance-driven reshuffling, as Kaiko explicitly states. The best execution quality is concentrated on specific venues – Bitvavo and Kraken – suggesting a venue story, not a continent-wide upgrade.
Furthermore, stablecoin-euro activity varies significantly across exchanges. Stablecoin-to-euro pairs accounted for about half of euro volume on Kraken and around 30% on Coinbase, but only about 4% on Binance and 2% on Bitvavo. This means the venues with the tightest euro spreads aren’t necessarily the ones where euro stablecoin trading dominates.
Stablecoins reduce friction in funding and rebalancing, particularly across borders and outside banking hours. They also provide exchanges with a compliant euro-adjacent product. However, a direct correlation between “EURC market cap up” and “ETH-EUR slippage down” is elusive. The focus should be on microstructure: where liquidity concentrates, how routing behaves, and which venues attract both flow and market makers.
The Bridge Story: Still Developing
Europe already had established crypto ETP infrastructure before MiCA, and it continues to expand. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin ETP launched in March 2024, and weekly fund flow data from CoinShares provides a public proxy for institutional allocation through listed products. However, the full impact of these developments is still unfolding.
The Verdict: Clearer Rules, Concentrated Liquidity
MiCA’s first year delivered what regulation does best: clearer categories, cleaner shelves, and a compliant euro stablecoin lineup. The doubled market cap is real, as DECTA’s data shows. The improved tradability of the euro is also real, but it’s more about liquidity concentrating in a few venues than a continent-wide upgrade.
For traders, the takeaway is almost mundane: euro stablecoins are the rails, but the ticket price is set by the books. MiCA helped make the rails credible, and liquidity improved where it concentrated. The real test for Europe in year two is whether this quality spreads beyond the winners, or whether the euro’s crypto market remains an archipelago where only a few islands are easily accessible.
Mentioned in this article
Bitcoin 
Ethereum