Bitcoin: $63B Signal Reveals Next Price Surge?

Bitcoin: The $63 Billion Credit Warning Signal That Could Trigger the Next Price Surge

Beneath a seemingly calm surface, corporate credit quality is deteriorating at an alarming rate. JPMorgan recently tallied roughly $55 billion in US corporate bonds that have fallen from investment-grade to junk status in 2025 – the so-called “fallen angels.” Simultaneously, only $10 billion have climbed back to investment-grade (“rising stars”). A further $63 billion of investment-grade debt now teeters on the brink of junk status, a significant increase from the $37 billion at the end of 2024. Despite this growing risk, credit spreads remain remarkably tight, suggesting investors aren’t yet fully pricing in a credit event. This disconnect creates a unique backdrop where Bitcoin can emerge as a compelling macro trade.

The Disconnect: Tight Spreads and Deteriorating Credit

As of January 15th, FRED data reveals investment-grade option-adjusted spreads at 0.76%, BBB spreads at 0.97%, and high-yield spreads at 2.71%. These levels are historically compressed, indicating a level of complacency that belies the underlying deterioration. Investors appear to be underestimating the potential for widespread downgrades. This situation is reminiscent of pre-crisis conditions, where a lack of perceived risk masks significant vulnerabilities.

Understanding Fallen Angels and Rising Stars

“Fallen angels” are bonds downgraded from investment-grade to junk status, triggering forced selling from institutional investors with mandate restrictions. “Rising stars” represent the opposite – upgrades from junk to investment-grade. The significant imbalance – $55 billion in downgrades versus only $10 billion in upgrades – highlights the prevailing downward pressure on corporate creditworthiness. This trend is a critical indicator of systemic risk.

Bitcoin as a Convex Macro Trade: A Two-Stage Mechanism

Bitcoin’s relationship with corporate credit is not static; it’s state-dependent. Academic research published in Wiley in August 2025 confirms a negative correlation between cryptocurrency returns and credit spreads, with the linkage becoming more pronounced during periods of market stress. This explains why Bitcoin often initially sells off when spreads widen, but can then rally sharply if the widening becomes severe enough to shift the policy outlook.

Phase 1: Tightening Financial Conditions & Risk-Off

The initial phase of widening credit spreads typically tightens financial conditions and reduces risk appetite. This impacts Bitcoin through the same channels that pressure high-beta equities: reduced leverage, risk-off positioning, and tighter liquidity. During this phase, Bitcoin is likely to experience selling pressure as investors de-risk their portfolios.

Phase 2: Monetary Policy Shift & Liquidity Injection

However, if credit deterioration accelerates and threatens corporate refinancing or broader financial stability, the Federal Reserve has a history of intervention. The March 23, 2020 establishment of the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility (PMCCF) and the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility (SMCCF) demonstrates this. Bank for International Settlements research on the SMCCF shows these announcements significantly lowered credit spreads by compressing credit risk premiums. For Bitcoin, these backstops and balance-sheet expansions represent a crucial liquidity regime change that crypto traders often anticipate, potentially front-running traditional asset repricing.

The Escalating Downgrade Pipeline: Numbers Tell the Story

Corporate bond downgrades surged to $55 billion in 2025 from just $4 billion in 2024, while upgrades plummeted from $22 billion to $10 billion. This dramatic shift underscores the growing fragility of the corporate debt market. The $63 billion pipeline of near-junk debt represents a significant potential for further downgrades, creating a loaded gun scenario.

Beyond Credit: Bitcoin as a Non-Credit Alternative

Corporate claims inherently carry default risk, maturity walls, and the potential for downgrade cascades. Bitcoin, however, possesses none of these features. It has no issuer cash flow, no credit rating, and no refinancing calendar. In a risk-off environment where investors are de-risking credit exposure, particularly as yields fall and the dollar weakens, Bitcoin can benefit as a non-credit alternative. This isn’t a “safe haven” argument, given Bitcoin’s volatility, but rather a rotation argument – a shift in capital towards assets without credit risk.

Dollar Dynamics and Monetary Liquidity

Bitcoin is highly sensitive to monetary liquidity narratives, not just those within the crypto market. While Bitcoin-dollar correlations are episodic, a scenario where credit stress drives both lower US yields and a policy pivot could lead to a weaker dollar, historically a supportive macro mix for Bitcoin. Falling real yields are particularly crucial, signaling a potential shift in monetary policy.

Three Plausible Scenarios and Their Impact on Bitcoin

Current market conditions present an unusual situation: compressed credit spreads alongside a substantial downgrade pipeline. This creates three potential paths, each with distinct implications for Bitcoin.

Scenario 1: Slow Bleed

Spreads drift wider gradually, without a significant gap. High-yield spreads might rise 50-100 basis points, and BBB spreads 20-40 basis points. The Fed remains cautious, and Bitcoin behaves like a risk asset, struggling as liquidity tightens without a policy shift. This is the most likely outcome in a gradual deterioration and is generally bearish or neutral for Bitcoin.

Scenario 2: Credit Wobble

Spreads reprice to levels that change the policy conversation, but don’t trigger a full-blown crisis. For example, high-yield spreads reaching roughly 401 basis points and investment-grade spreads reaching 106 basis points (as seen in April 2025). This prompts the Fed to reconsider its path. If Treasuries rally on risk-off flows while the market anticipates rate cuts, Bitcoin can pivot faster than equities. This “convex” scenario involves an initial drop followed by a rally ahead of the policy shift.

Scenario 3: Credit Shock

Spreads gap to crisis levels, forced selling accelerates, and the Fed deploys balance-sheet tools or other liquidity backstops. Bitcoin experiences extreme volatility, with an initial selloff followed by a sharp rally as liquidity expectations shift. The 2020 experience provides a clear example: Bitcoin fell from $10,000 to $4,000 in mid-March, then climbed above $60,000 within a year as the Fed intervened.

The Dashboard for Tracking the Shift

Monitoring the following indicators is crucial for determining whether credit stress will become a tailwind for Bitcoin:

• High-Yield and BBB Spreads: A disproportionate widening of BBB spreads signals the “fallen angel” pipeline is being priced in.
• CDX IG and CDX HY Indices: Provide a cleaner read on market sentiment.
• US Treasury Real Yields and the Dollar: Rising real yields and a strengthening dollar are toxic for Bitcoin, while falling real yields suggest a potential policy shift.
• Liquidity Plumbing: Any signs of Fed facilities, balance-sheet expansion, or repo operations are critical, as stablecoins and on-chain crypto liquidity react to monetary shocks.

Conclusion: Positioning for the Potential Upside

The credit market is sending mixed signals. January opened with strong investment-grade issuance and low risk premiums, suggesting investors aren’t yet bracing for a 2020-style event. However, the $63 billion near-junk pipeline remains a significant threat. If spreads remain contained, the credit-stress narrative for Bitcoin remains hypothetical. But if spreads gap, the sequencing is key: the shock first, then the easing of expectations. Bitcoin’s bullish case isn’t about avoiding the initial shock, but about capitalizing on the subsequent policy response faster than assets tied to corporate cash flows and credit ratings.

Mentioned in this article

Bitcoin JPMorgan